I usually avoid going to my local AMC movie theater. Decades old, it has had a decaying lobby, saggy seats, and a rather worn-out feeling. Several weeks ago, though, as the only place with a good time to see Chef, I went there. And I was pleasantly surprised.
Fully reclining and really wide, my seats were a pleasure! This is what they looked like:
The second largest movie chain in the US, AMC has decided that the way to reverse declining demand is with reclining seats. Because the reclining seats are massive, their installation requires eliminating up to two-thirds of an auditorium’s seating capacity. Even with the cost at $350,000 to $500,000 per renovation, AMC has decided that “less is more.”
With entertainment alternatives multiplying, the problem for movie theaters has been other sources of demand. We are staying home to watch Netflix and have no need to go to the movies when we leave home.
However, the “reseated” theaters seem to be changing our demand. They attract more adults, a mid-week audience, and for me, are a comfy way to watch a movie that is better than my couch. During the “seeding” times, at the 37 AMC theaters that have been “reseated,” box office revenue spiked by 60% and attendance, by 80%.
The company notes that only venues with attendance problems will enjoy the renovation. Most NYC theaters, for example, fully utilize their seating capacity. If AMC were to install recliners and eliminate two-thirds of all seats in NYC, their revenue would sink.
Our bottom line: Supply and demand are affected by reclining seats at movie theaters. On the supply side, because wider movie seats increase a firm’s expense, the impact should be a decrease in supply. Meanwhile though, for the demand side, there is an increase in the number of movie tickets people are willing and able to buy. The result? Less supply, more demand and more expensive tickets.